What Makes a Significant Hill?
Is it possible to define a globally applicable, height and prominence-free definition of a significant hill? As a child I could reel off the highest points in each continent and in numerous countries around the world. Soon after we were married, my wife and I made a point of climbing the highest summits at least in England, Wales and Scotland, although tentative plans to work through the Munros ground to a halt after three Cairngorm summits plus Schiehallion. All hills are worth climbing of course, because they're there, but are some hills more worth climbing than others? There are many lists of hills out there, of which the Munros are by far the most famous. But, stuck in East Anglia, with even the Peak District barely in range, and certainly nothing approaching 3000 feet, does that mean one should give up? Well, even in the South-East there are Marilyns. The definitions of a [significant] hill seem so arbitrary though, 3000 feet for Munros, 2500 feet for Corbetts, 150m promine